Premium
Apically‐Extruded Debris Using The ProTaper System
Author(s) -
Azar Nasim Gheshlaghi,
Ebrahimi Gholamreza
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
australian endodontic journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.703
H-Index - 34
eISSN - 1747-4477
pISSN - 1329-1947
DOI - 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2005.tb00202.x
Subject(s) - debris , dentistry , molar , significant difference , root canal , orthodontics , dental instruments , extrusion , materials science , medicine , composite material , geology , oceanography
The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the quantity of debris and irrigant extruded apically using the ProTaper system compared to ProFiles and K‐Flexofiles. Thirty‐six mesio‐buccal root canals of human mandibular molars were selected and divided into three groups of twelve canals. Two groups were instrumented with ProFiles and ProTapers according to the manufacturer's instructions. The other group was instrumented with K‐Flexofiles using the step‐back technique. A standard amount of irrigant was used for each canal. Apically‐extruded debris and irrigant was collected in pre‐weighed vials. The mean weight of extruded debris and irrigant for each group was statistically analysed using Student's t‐test and one‐way ANOVA. All instrumentation techniques produced extruded debris and irrigant. Although the mean amount of extrusion with the step‐back technique was higher than the two rotary systems, there was no significant difference between the three groups (p > 0.05). NiTi rotary systems were associated with less apical extrusion, but were not significantly better than hand file instrumentation. All techniques extruded debris.