Premium
Reservation Gaming, Tribal Sovereignty, and the State of Texas: Gaining Ground in the Political Arena?
Author(s) -
Skopek Tracy A.,
Hansen Kenneth
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
politics and policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.259
H-Index - 23
eISSN - 1747-1346
pISSN - 1555-5623
DOI - 10.1111/j.1747-1346.2006.00006.x
Subject(s) - reservation , negotiation , politics , state (computer science) , government (linguistics) , devolution (biology) , sovereignty , interest group , political science , scope (computer science) , special interest group , investment (military) , order (exchange) , public administration , political economy , business , law , economics , sociology , finance , linguistics , philosophy , programming language , algorithm , computer science , anthropology , human evolution
The increased devolution of federal responsibilities to states coupled with lack of programs and income is heightening the need for economic development among Native American tribes. The fastest growing and most profitable investment is reservation casino gambling. However, the inability of many tribes to successfully negotiate gaming ‘compacts’ with state governments as prescribed by federal law is creating a new dynamic in state politics. Tribal governments are increasingly engaged in interest group behavior, such as narrowing the scope of conflict, and inside and outside lobbying, to try and create favorable policy decisions. Using a case study of two Texas tribes, an analysis of interest group learning is conducted. We conclude that, in order to survive, tribal gaming interest groups must gain access to state political venues instead of relying on the federal government and the courts.