Premium
Raiders of the Lost Vote: A Theory‐Driven Model of Ballot Invalidation in Florida's 2000 Election
Author(s) -
KellyWoessner April,
Woessner Matthew C.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
politics and policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.259
H-Index - 23
eISSN - 1747-1346
pISSN - 1555-5623
DOI - 10.1111/j.1747-1346.2005.tb00643.x
Subject(s) - ballot , product (mathematics) , measure (data warehouse) , econometrics , political science , psychology , computer science , voting , economics , law , mathematics , data mining , geometry , politics
In analyzing the results of the 2000 Florida election, we argue the need for a more theoretical model of ballot invalidation. The majority of studies to date link together both undervotes and overvotes into one measure of “rejected,” “voided” or “invalidated” ballots. We demonstrate that these two types of errors are notably distinct. Specifically, overvoting involves more cognitive or “decision” errors, while undervoting is more a product of mechanical or “physical” errors. As such, we maintain that undervotes are more likely to be the product of random error and are less likely to be related to the racial composition of a district than are overvotes.