z-logo
Premium
EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE RICE PRODUCTION STRUCTURE IN TAIWAN, 1976‐93
Author(s) -
KURODA Yoshimi
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
the developing economies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.305
H-Index - 30
eISSN - 1746-1049
pISSN - 0012-1533
DOI - 10.1111/j.1746-1049.1998.tb00861.x
Subject(s) - christian ministry , citation , constructive , library science , foundation (evidence) , scholarship , sociology , computer science , political science , law , process (computing) , operating system
N the early period of Taiwan's economic development, in particular during the 1950s and 1960s, rice production increased rapidly, not only meeting the needs of domestic food consumption but also providing a surplus for export. However, since around the mid-1970s, Taiwan's agriculture has witnessed a gen- eral decrease in the production of rice which fell from a peak of 2.71 million metric tons (in terms of brown rice) in 1976 to 1.82 million metric tons in 1993, corre- sponding to a 33 per cent reduction during the seventeen-year period. Needless to say, the total production is a product of the total planted area and the yield per unit of land. How did these two factors change in the course of rice production in Tai- wan? To begin with, the total planted area for rice production has shown a strong downward trend. It decreased drastically from 790,248 hectares in 1975 to 391,457 hectares in 1993, corresponding to a 50 per cent reduction during the eighteen-year period. There are two main reasons for such a decrease in the rice production: (1) a switch in 1977 from a policy of unlimited purchases to one that limited purchases by the government; and (2) the paddy field diversion program launched in 1984. On the other hand, however, there has been a significant increase in the yield per hectare from 3,450 kilograms in 1976 to 4,655 kilograms in 1993 (in terms of brown rice), corresponding to almost a 35 per cent increase during the seventeen- year period, and implying a compound annual growth rate of 1.8 per cent which is fairly high on an international standard (see Hayami 1995, p. 101). The higher

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here