z-logo
Premium
THE INFLUENCE OF BLAME AND BELIEVABILITY FACTORS ON THE PROCESSING OF SIMPLE VERSUS AGGRAVATED RAPE CASES *
Author(s) -
HORNEY JULIE,
SPOHN CASSIA
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
criminology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.467
H-Index - 139
eISSN - 1745-9125
pISSN - 0011-1384
DOI - 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1996.tb01200.x
Subject(s) - blame , simple (philosophy) , psychology , test (biology) , social psychology , criminology , paleontology , philosophy , epistemology , biology
In this study we test two hypotheses concerning the processing of simple and aggravated rape cases. First, we test the hypothesis that aggravated rape cases are taken more seriously than simple rape cases by decision makers in the criminal justice system and, thus, aggravated cases will result in more serious outcomes. Second, we test the hypothesis that the influence of factors relating to the blame and believability of a victim on case processing is greater in simple than in aggravated rape cases. Our results indicate that the characteristics and outcomes of aggravated and simple rape cases are surprisingly similar, and that there is little evidence of an interaction between type of case and victim characteristics.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here