Premium
Consumer Welfare and Inefficiency Among Regulated Industries
Author(s) -
BABILOT GEORGE,
FRANTZ ROGER,
GREEN LOUIS
Publication year - 1985
Publication title -
journal of consumer affairs
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.582
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1745-6606
pISSN - 0022-0078
DOI - 10.1111/j.1745-6606.1985.tb00352.x
Subject(s) - allocative efficiency , inefficiency , economics , monopoly , microeconomics , production (economics) , competition (biology) , deadweight loss , welfare , labour economics , monetary economics , market economy , ecology , biology
While the issue of efficiency on the side of production is still not a settled question, it is generally agreed that competition is more conductive to efficiency—both allocative and X—than monopoly. When the monopoly is regulated, i.e., receiving a rate of return less than it would if left unregulated but greater than the market rate of return, both allocative and X‐inefficiency result. Since the degree of inefficiency amounts to a tax on consumers, the question of inefficiency in production has a twin companion in the form of consumer welfare losses. This is particularly true for many public utilities upon which low income families spend a large proportion of their income. The quasi tax that the regulated monopolist exacts neither generates a flow of public goods nor increases returns to shareholders. It is a particularly burdensome levy because the rate structure is highly regressive.