Premium
Analysis of Water Saturation, NAPL Content, Degradation Half‐Life, and Lower Boundary Conditions on VOC Transport Modeling: Implications for Closure of Soil Venting Systems
Author(s) -
DiGiulio Dominic C.,
Varadhan Ravi
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
groundwater monitoring and remediation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.677
H-Index - 47
eISSN - 1745-6592
pISSN - 1069-3629
DOI - 10.1111/j.1745-6592.2001.tb00644.x
Subject(s) - vadose zone , saturation (graph theory) , soil water , boundary value problem , environmental science , soil science , groundwater , flux (metallurgy) , water content , boundary (topology) , geology , mechanics , geotechnical engineering , hydrology (agriculture) , chemistry , mathematics , physics , mathematical analysis , organic chemistry , combinatorics
Abstract Simulations using a one‐dimensional, analytical, vadose zone, solute‐transport screening code (VFLUX) were conducted to assess the effect of water saturation, NAPL saturation, degradation half‐life, and boundary conditions at the vadose zone/ground water interface on model output. At high initial soil concentrations, model output was significantly affected by input parameters and lower boundary conditions yet still resulted in consistent decision‐making to initiate or continue venting application. At lower soil concentrations, however, typical of what is observed after prolonged venting application, differences in model input and selection of lower boundary conditions resulted in inconsistent decision‐making. Specifically, under conditions of low water saturation, use of a first‐type, time‐dependent lower boundary condition indicated that the primary direction of mass flux was from ground water to the vadose zone, suggesting little benefit from continued venting application. Use of a finite, zero‐gradient lower boundary condition, though, indicated continued mass flux from the vadose zone to ground water, suggesting a continued need for venting application. In this situation, sensitivity analysis of input parameters, selection of boundary conditions, and consideration of overall objectives in vadose zone modeling become critical in regulatory decision‐making.