Premium
Field Demonstrations Using the Waterloo Ground Water Profiler
Author(s) -
Pitkin Seth E.,
Cherry John A.,
Ingleton Robert A.,
Broholm Mette
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
groundwater monitoring and remediation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.677
H-Index - 47
eISSN - 1745-6592
pISSN - 1069-3629
DOI - 10.1111/j.1745-6592.1999.tb00213.x
Subject(s) - contamination , environmental science , drag , solvent , sampling (signal processing) , aquifer , sampling interval , groundwater , hydrology (agriculture) , geology , chemistry , physics , geotechnical engineering , mechanics , mathematics , optics , statistics , ecology , organic chemistry , detector , biology
Abstract Use of direct‐push sampling tools fur rapid investigations of contaminated sites has proliferated in the past several years. A direct‐push device, referred to as a ground water sampling profiler, was recently developed at the University of Waterloo. This tool differs from oilier direct‐push tools in that point samples are collected at multiple depths in the same hole without retrieving, decontaminating, and re‐driving the tool alter each sampling event. The collection of point samples, rather than samples from a longer screened interval, allows an exceptional level of detail to be generated about the vertical distribution of contamination from each hole. The benefits of acquiring this level of detail arc contingent on minimization of vertical cross contamination of samples caused by drag down from high concentration zones into underlying low concentration zones. In a detailed study of chlorinated solvent plumes in sandy aquifers, we found that drag down using the profiler is minimal or non‐detectable even when the tool is driven through high concentration zones of dissolved chlorinated solvent contamination. Chlorinated solvent concentrations, primarily PCE and TCE at or below a detection limit of 1 μg/L, were obtained directly beneath plumes with maximum concentrations up to thousands of μg/L. Minimal drag down, on the order of a few μg/L to 20 μg/L, may have been observed below chlorinated solvent concentrations of several tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of μg/L. Drag down through DNAPL zones was not evaluated.