Premium
An Assessment of the Nguyen and Finder Method for Slug Test Analysis
Author(s) -
Butler James J.,
Hyder Zafar
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
groundwater monitoring and remediation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.677
H-Index - 47
eISSN - 1745-6592
pISSN - 1069-3629
DOI - 10.1111/j.1745-6592.1994.tb00490.x
Subject(s) - slug test , reliability (semiconductor) , field (mathematics) , computer science , statistics , test (biology) , algorithm , data mining , mathematics , geology , aquifer , geotechnical engineering , physics , power (physics) , quantum mechanics , pure mathematics , groundwater , paleontology
The Nguyen and Pinder method is one of four techniques commonly used for analysis of response data from slug tests. Limited field research has raised questions about the reliability of the parameter estimates obtained with this method. A theoretical evaluation of this technique reveals that errors were made in the derivation of the analytical solution upon which the technique is based. Simulation and field examples show that the errors result in parameter estimates that can differ from actual values by orders of magnitude. These findings indicate that the Nguyen and Pinder method should no longer be a tool in the repertoire of the field hydrogeologist. If data from a slug test performed in a partially penetrating well in a confined aquifer need to be analyzed, recent work has shown that the Hvorslev method is the best alternative among the commonly used techniques.