z-logo
Premium
Interpolation of Steady‐State Concentration Data by Inverse Modeling
Author(s) -
Schwede Ronnie L.,
Cirpka Olaf A.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
groundwater
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.84
H-Index - 94
eISSN - 1745-6584
pISSN - 0017-467X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00668.x
Subject(s) - kriging , interpolation (computer graphics) , nonlinear system , hydraulic conductivity , mathematics , monte carlo method , conditional probability distribution , field (mathematics) , statistical physics , statistics , soil science , environmental science , physics , quantum mechanics , motion (physics) , classical mechanics , pure mathematics , soil water
In most groundwater applications, measurements of concentration are limited in number and sparsely distributed within the domain of interest. Therefore, interpolation techniques are needed to obtain most likely values of concentration at locations where no measurements are available. For further processing, for example, in environmental risk analysis, interpolated values should be given with uncertainty bounds, so that a geostatistical framework is preferable. Linear interpolation of steady‐state concentration measurements is problematic because the dependence of concentration on the primary uncertain material property, the hydraulic conductivity field, is highly nonlinear, suggesting that the statistical interrelationship between concentration values at different points is also nonlinear. We suggest interpolating steady‐state concentration measurements by conditioning an ensemble of the underlying log‐conductivity field on the available hydrological data in a conditional Monte Carlo approach. Flow and transport simulations for each conditional conductivity field must meet the measurements within their given uncertainty. The ensemble of transport simulations based on the conditional log‐conductivity fields yields conditional statistical distributions of concentration at points between observation points. This method implicitly meets physical bounds of concentration values and non‐Gaussianity of their statistical distributions and obeys the nonlinearity of the underlying processes. We validate our method by artificial test cases and compare the results to kriging estimates assuming different conditional statistical distributions of concentration. Assuming a beta distribution in kriging leads to estimates of concentration with zero probability of concentrations below zero or above the maximal possible value; however, the concentrations are not forced to meet the advection‐dispersion equation.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here