z-logo
Premium
Hurricanes Create a Crossroads for Hydrological Management of the Mississippi River Delta
Author(s) -
Keim Richard F.,
Blanford William J.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
groundwater
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.84
H-Index - 94
eISSN - 1745-6584
pISSN - 0017-467X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2006.00195.x
Subject(s) - flooding (psychology) , storm , flood myth , flood control , levee , hazard , civil engineering , event (particle physics) , environmental planning , storm surge , coastal flood , environmental resource management , engineering , geography , climate change , environmental science , geology , meteorology , ecology , cartography , psychology , sea level rise , oceanography , physics , archaeology , quantum mechanics , psychotherapist , biology
The flooding of New Orleans by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita has forced the public to confront the concepts of hydrological risk and hazard, both directly in the form of engineering obstacles and as interwoven into overlapping and evolving sociological, geological, and ecological systems. The problems in the Mississippi River delta were not caused by the storm but arose gradually with the development of economic infrastructure in the region. Neither will the complex of problems be eliminated by any solution designed to prevent repetition of an event of this type. Instead, the continually changing systems are best approached by adaptive management that integrates hydrological engineering and ecological restoration. The ‘‘permanent’’ fix to sustainable development of coastal Louisiana actually lies with adopting evolving management plans that incorporate multiple values to recognize engineering, economic, and hydrologic realities. The task for engineering hydrologists, as it is being defined in the months following the storms, is to generate technological solutions to prevent another major flooding event in the city. Solutions will require rapid and thorough evaluation of the engineering and maintenance flaws in the present storm management system and marshaling political will to pay the daunting costs to address them. Technical reviews of the structural failures that occurred in the city’s flood-control infrastructure during Katrina are being conducted by the National Academies of Science and Engineering, the American Society of Civil Engineers, the Louisiana State University Hurricane Center, and other organizations. Early results of these inquiries suggest that hydrological stresses did not exceed the design standards of all levees and canals, but that design and construction flaws were responsible for at least some of the failures. Importantly, desires to reduce construction or maintenance costs associated with constructing a functioning levee system within the context of local geological conditions and pressures to minimize the effect on local commerce appear to have contributed to these flaws. Understandably, displaced residents and businesses have expressed reluctance to return to a city that presently has minimal flood protection and uncertain long-term protection. The response from political leaders has been to ask the hydrological engineering community to develop fail-safe solutions rapidly. Perhaps, because the flooding from Katrina in retrospect seems to have been partially preventable, there is a sense among the public that new and substantially improved water-control structures can provide the needed security. In fact, structures likely can be developed to protect New Orleans, despite considerable technical difficulties that include rapid regional and local subsidence, unstable soils, and the proximity to sea level. For example, some have suggested hydrological compartmentalization of the city to reduce the consequences of failure for any single flow-control structure. Unlike the New Orleans metropolitan area, most communities in coastal Louisiana are not surrounded by levees. Although there are disjunct levees built to prevent localized flooding, protection from hurricane surges has mainly been provided by the extensive coastal and deltaic wetlands. But subsidence, storms, and disturbances to those wetlands have eroded the physical extent of their coverage as well as their ability to provide protection from hurricane surges. Water-control structures on the Mississippi River and its distributaries have tremendously altered the processes responsible for forming and maintaining the delta. Sediment and nutrients formerly delivered to wetlands during floods are now carried to the mouth of the river and off the edge of the continental shelf. Without these additions, deposition rates within wetlands have not kept pace with consolidation rates within the delta and subsidence has resulted. Subsidence appears to have been locally accelerated by extraction of subsurface hydrocarbon deposits. Water impounded by canal spoil banks, highways, and railroads as well as salt water intrusion into fresh water wetlands via canals for navigation and oil and gas exploration have locally disrupted ecosystems and reduced 1Corresponding author: Assistant Professor, School of Renewable Natural Resources, Louisiana State University and LSU Agricultural Center, 227 Renewable Natural Resources Building, Baton Rouge, LA 70803; (225) 578-4169; rkeim@lsu.edu 2Department of Geology and Geophysics, Louisiana State University, E235 Howe-Russell Building, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 Copyright a 2006 The Author(s) Journal compilationa 2006 National Ground Water Association. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2006.00195.x

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here