Premium
Estimating Ground Water Recharge from Topography, Hydrogeology, and Land Cover
Author(s) -
Cherkauer Douglas S.,
Ansari Sajjad A.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
groundwater
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.84
H-Index - 94
eISSN - 1745-6584
pISSN - 0017-467X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2005.tb02289.x
Subject(s) - groundwater recharge , baseflow , hydrograph , hydrology (agriculture) , land cover , environmental science , watershed , streamflow , groundwater , hydrogeology , precipitation , aquifer , surface runoff , geology , drainage basin , land use , geography , ecology , meteorology , computer science , geotechnical engineering , cartography , machine learning , biology
Proper management of ground water resources requires knowledge of the rates and spatial distribution of recharge to aquifers. This information is needed at scales ranging from that of individual communities to regional. This paper presents a methodology to calculate recharge from readily available ground surface information without long‐term monitoring. The method is viewed as providing a reasonable, but conservative, first approximation of recharge, which can then be fine‐tuned with other methods as time permits. Stream baseflow was measured as a surrogate for recharge in small watersheds in southeastern Wisconsin. It is equated to recharge (R) and then normalized to observed annual precipitation (P). Regression analysis was constrained by requiring that the independent and dependent variables be dimensionally consistent. It shows that R/P is controlled by three dimensionless ratios: (1) infiltrating to overland water flux, (2) vertical to lateral distance water must travel, and (3) percentage of land cover in the natural state. The individual watershed properties that comprise these ratios are now commonly available in GIS data bases. The empirical relationship for predicting R/P developed for the study watersheds is shown to be statistically viable and is then tested outside the study area and against other methods of calculating recharge. The method produces values that agree with baseflow separation from streamflow hydrographs (to within 15% to 20%), ground water budget analysis (4%), well hydrograph analysis (12%), and a distributed‐parameter watershed model calibrated to total streamflow (18%). It has also reproduced the temporal variation over 5 yr observed at a well site with an average error < 12%.