Premium
A Method of Performing Response Tests on Highly Permeable Aquifers
Author(s) -
Prosser Donald W.
Publication year - 1981
Publication title -
groundwater
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.84
H-Index - 94
eISSN - 1745-6584
pISSN - 0017-467X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1981.tb03512.x
Subject(s) - transducer , head (geology) , hydraulic conductivity , slug test , pressure sensor , displacement (psychology) , acoustics , aquifer , response time , frequency response , conductivity , pressure head , geology , computer science , engineering , geotechnical engineering , electrical engineering , mechanical engineering , physics , groundwater , soil science , psychology , computer graphics (images) , quantum mechanics , geomorphology , psychotherapist , soil water
Response or “slug” tests to determine the hydraulic conductivity of in situ earth materials are often difficult to perform in situations of very high hydraulic conductivity. In small‐diameter standpipes, rapid response to the induced head difference, often in a matter of seconds, is difficult to measure with conventional well sounders. Instantaneous induction of a known head difference is also a major problem when dealing with very fast response times. A method of performing such tests has been developed, utilizing electronic pressure transducers to monitor the response to a pneumatically induced head. Increased air pressure within the standpipe causes displacement of the water column to accommodate the air pressure. Once the aquifer has re‐equilibrated in this condition, sudden release of the air pressure constitutes an instantaneously induced head difference. The response measured by the electronic pressure transducer can be recorded digitally or by an analog chart recorder with fast paper speed. This method has been used to measure basic time lags in the order of several seconds. The use of electronic pressure transducers and pneumatically induced head differences will allow accurate measurements in situations of higher hydraulic conductivity than would be possible using common response testing techniques.