Premium
Cross‐Disciplinarity in Australian Geography Presidential Address to the Institute of Australian Geographers’ Conference, Melbourne, July 2007 1
Author(s) -
KIRKPATRICK J.B.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
geographical research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.695
H-Index - 47
eISSN - 1745-5871
pISSN - 1745-5863
DOI - 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2007.00455.x
Subject(s) - discipline , presidential address , subject (documents) , geography , publication , human geography , social science , space (punctuation) , critical geography , sociology , historical geography , regional science , economic geography , library science , political science , law , public administration , linguistics , philosophy , computer science
The disciplinary space that geographers conceive to be theirs has all been previously possessed, or latterly colonised, by other disciplines. Geographers defend their existence on the basis of their oft‐asserted, but never tested, cross‐disciplinarity. The journals in which refereed papers were published by members of the Institute of Australian Geographers (IAG) and the papers in Australian Geographical Studies were analysed for the period 1998–2002 to test the hypothesis of cross‐disciplinarity in both subject and method. IAG members do strongly tend to publish in more than one disciplinary area, and a large proportion of papers in Australian Geographical Studies are integrative across subdisciplines in geography, with many using more than one methodological approach. However, transgression of the physical geography/human geography divide was sufficiently uncommon to create a statistical break between sets of subdisciplines. Based on the data used in the present paper, Australian geographers can make a case for being members of a vital, integrative discipline, likely to make substantial advances in the hybrid spaces.