Premium
UNIAXIAL COMPRESSION OF UF‐FETA CHEESE RELATED TO SENSORY TEXTURE ANALYSIS
Author(s) -
WIUM H.,
QVIST K.B.,
GROSS M.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
journal of texture studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.593
H-Index - 54
eISSN - 1745-4603
pISSN - 0022-4901
DOI - 10.1111/j.1745-4603.1997.tb00128.x
Subject(s) - texture (cosmology) , partial least squares regression , rheology , materials science , food science , sensory system , compression (physics) , deformation (meteorology) , mathematics , composite material , chemistry , biology , statistics , artificial intelligence , neuroscience , computer science , image (mathematics)
Rheological characteristics of seven Feta cheeses with different textures and produced from ultrafiltered milk (UF‐Feta cheeses) were evaluated by uniaxial compression and sensory texture analysis. The effect of uniaxial deformation rate (50–2500 mm/min) on four rheological parameters: Stress at fracture s̀ f ), Hencky strain at fracture (ɛ f ), deformability modulus (E) and work to fracture (W f ) was examined. Three Principal Components (PC) described 76, 16 and 4% respectively, of the variation in the uniaxial compression data set (4 parameters at 12 deformation rates). Statistically α f , E and W f described the same type of information in the data set. Six sensory texture attributes of the UF‐Feta cheeses were evaluated by a sensory texture panel: nonoral firmness, nonoral brittleness, nonoral spreadability, oral crumbliness, oral firmness and oral stickiness. One PC described 93% of the variation in the sensory texture data and grouped the sensory variables into two negatively correlated groups: nonoral firmness nonoral brittleness, oral firmness and oral crumbliness versus nonoral spreadability and oral stickiness. Correlations and Partial Least Squares regression (PLS) between instrumental and sensory texture variables showed that nonoral and oral firmness were the nonoral and oral sensory variables best predicted from instrumental measurements. α f , E and W f were all able to predict nonoral and oral firmness. Of the instrumental parameters, α f generally gave the best correlation to nonoral firmness at all deformation rates. Above a deformation rate of 50 mm/min correlations between α f and nonoral firmness were almost independent of deformation rate, and at any deformation rate correlations between α f and oral firmness