Premium
CONSUMER PREFERENCE FOR TACTILE SOFTNESS: A QUESTION OF AFFECT INTENSITY?
Author(s) -
KERGOAT MARINE,
GIBOREAU AGNÈS,
NICOD HUGUETTE,
FAYE PAULINE,
DIAZ EMMANUELLE,
BEETSCHEN MARIEAGNÈS,
MEYER THIERRY
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of sensory studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.61
H-Index - 53
eISSN - 1745-459X
pISSN - 0887-8250
DOI - 10.1111/j.1745-459x.2012.00388.x
Subject(s) - affect (linguistics) , sensory system , psychology , construct (python library) , preference , product (mathematics) , intensity (physics) , cognitive psychology , dimension (graph theory) , social psychology , mathematics , computer science , communication , statistics , optics , pure mathematics , physics , geometry , programming language
Previous studies have shown that consumers with higher affect intensity expressed stronger preferences for softer car seat fabrics (Kergoat et al .). The present research aims to consolidate and expand these results. Across two studies, we attempt to determine whether the intensity of affect (as measured by the affect intensity measure; Larsen) is a more general construct involved in soft textile preferences. Through the evaluation of two product categories (car seat fabrics and washed‐shirt fabrics) and the manipulation of product sensory attributes, we were able to establish that affect intensity components (positive intensity and negative reactivity) play a role in soft textile preferences, independent of the product category. The highest predictive value of particular affect intensity components for softness preference is discussed in line with the multidimensional approach of the affect intensity construct (Bryant et al .). PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS This research highlights the significance of one emotional individual difference dimension (affect intensity) accounting for consumer tactile sensory preferences. Practically, it offers a way to characterize clusters of heterogeneous tactile sensory preferences observed in consumer tests. Furthermore, it represents a step in the understanding of underlying processes involved in soft tactile sensory preferences. We can assume these implications are not limited to the sense of touch and/or non‐food products. As a general emotional variable, the affect intensity construct must play a role in various blind sensory evaluation settings and be a significant tool for a typology of consumers.