Premium
Interpreting the Results of Three Different Standard‐Setting Procedures
Author(s) -
Green Donald Ross,
Trimble C. Scott,
Lewis Daniel M.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
educational measurement: issues and practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.158
H-Index - 52
eISSN - 1745-3992
pISSN - 0731-1745
DOI - 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2003.tb00113.x
Subject(s) - set (abstract data type) , computer science , information retrieval , programming language
Different standard‐setting procedures usually produce different cut points even if each has a rational basis. In 2000, three standard‐setting procedures were implemented to set cut scores in each of the 18 grade/content areas comprising Kentucky's state assessment system: the Contrasting Groups, Bookmark, and Jaeger‐Mills procedures. Subsequently, participants from each of the three procedures worked together in each grade/content area to synthesize the results. These synthesis participants considered the results of, and examined the materials and information provided by, each of the three separate procedures. In this article the synthesis processes are described and discussed.