Premium
SEX AS PREDICTIVE OF SALARY AND STATUS ON A UNIVERSITY FACULTY
Author(s) -
LOEB JANE,
FERBER MARIANNE
Publication year - 1971
Publication title -
journal of educational measurement
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.917
H-Index - 47
eISSN - 1745-3984
pISSN - 0022-0655
DOI - 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1971.tb00932.x
Subject(s) - salary , rank (graph theory) , psychology , merit pay , sample (material) , predictability , medical education , social psychology , statistics , mathematics , medicine , political science , economics , law , chemistry , chromatography , combinatorics , microeconomics , incentive
An investigation of the existence and extent of sex‐based inequities in rank and pay on a University faculty yielded several suggestions of discrimination against women. Data on professional experience, publications, honors, rank and pay were collected by means of a questionnaire distributed to 372 faculty members. Within a sample of 128 who answered all requisite items, sex added significantly to the predictability of salary beyond that achieved by multiple measures of merit and experience, including mean salary for rank and department. Sex itself did not predict rank or a measure designed to reflect speed of advancement through the ranks. Terms reflecting interactions of sex and merit were capable of improving prediction of all three status measures, however, suggesting differences in the reward structure for the sexes.