Premium
Leukocytapheresis for Ulcerative Colitis: A Comparative Study of Anticoagulant (Nafamostat Mesilate vs. Dalteparin Sodium) for Reducing Clinical Complications
Author(s) -
Ashizuka Shinya,
Nishiura Ryosuke,
Ishikawa Naoto,
Yamaga Junichi,
Inatsu Haruhiko,
Fujimoto Shouichi,
Eto Tanenao
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
therapeutic apheresis and dialysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.415
H-Index - 53
eISSN - 1744-9987
pISSN - 1744-9979
DOI - 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2006.00309.x
Subject(s) - medicine , ulcerative colitis , adverse effect , nausea , vomiting , chills , anticoagulant , gastroenterology , anesthesia , disease
Leukocytapheresis (LCAP) is a therapeutic strategy for extra corporeal immunomodulation that has been used to treat several immunological disorders, including ulcerative colitis (UC), with encouraging results, inducing remission in steroid‐resistant patients. However, we have experienced some complications during or after LCAP therapy. Common adverse effects include fever, chills, nausea, vomiting, and hypotension. One of the reasons for these adverse effects might be the use of nafamostat mesilate (NM) as an anticoagulant. In the present study, 75 patients with UC were divided into two groups, an NM group and a dalteparin sodium (DS) group. The clinical efficacy of these treatments, improvement after treatment, changes in leukocyte differential count, and adverse effects after LCAP therapy were then compared. The clinical efficacy, improvement after treatment, and changes in leukocyte classification were not significantly different between the two groups, while some adverse effects were observed in the NM group but not in the DS group. In conclusion, LCAP therapy is a useful therapy for patients with moderate to severe UC who fail to respond to glucocorticoid therapy, however, a safe anticoagulant should be used to avoid its related adverse effects.