Premium
Comparison of Vegetation Indices and Red‐edge Parameters for Estimating Grassland Cover from Canopy Reflectance Data
Author(s) -
Liu ZhanYu,
Huang JingFeng,
Wu XinHong,
Dong YongPing
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of integrative plant biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.734
H-Index - 83
eISSN - 1744-7909
pISSN - 1672-9072
DOI - 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2007.00401.x
Subject(s) - spectroradiometer , hyperspectral imaging , red edge , normalized difference vegetation index , environmental science , vegetation (pathology) , remote sensing , enhanced vegetation index , grassland , canopy , moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer , reflectivity , leaf area index , vegetation index , geography , agronomy , satellite , medicine , physics , archaeology , pathology , engineering , aerospace engineering , optics , biology
There has been a great deal of interests in the estimation of grassland biophysical parameters such as percentage of vegetation cover (PVC), aboveground biomass, and leaf‐area index with remote sensing data at the canopy scale. In this paper, the percentage of vegetation cover was estimated from vegetation indices using Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data and red‐edge parameters through the first derivative spectrum from in situ hypserspectral reflectance data. Hyperspectral reflectance measurements were made on grasslands in Inner Mongolia, China, using an Analytical Spectral Devices spectroradiometer. Vegetation indices such as the difference, simple ratio, normalized difference, renormalized difference, soil‐adjusted and modified soil‐adjusted vegetation indices (DVI, RVI, NDVI, RDVI, SAVI L = 0.5 and MSAVI 2 ) were calculated from the hyperspectral reflectance of various vegetation covers. The percentage of vegetation cover was estimated using an unsupervised spectral‐contextual classifier automatically. Relationships between percentage of vegetation cover and various vegetation indices and red‐edge parameters were compared using a linear and second‐order polynomial regression. Our analysis indicated that MSAVI 2 and RVI yielded more accurate estimations for a wide range of vegetation cover than other vegetation indices and red‐edge parameters for the linear and second‐order polynomial regression, respectively.