Premium
Geographical and Seasonal Variation in the Richness of Ant‐Plant Interactions in México 1
Author(s) -
RicoGray Victor,
GarcíaFranco José G.,
PalaciosRios Mónica,
ízCastelazo Cecilia,
ParraTabla Victor,
Navarro Jorge A.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
biotropica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.813
H-Index - 96
eISSN - 1744-7429
pISSN - 0006-3606
DOI - 10.1111/j.1744-7429.1998.tb00054.x
Subject(s) - ecology , species richness , vegetation (pathology) , habitat , temperate climate , floristics , seasonality , precipitation , generalist and specialist species , rainforest , biology , geography , medicine , pathology , meteorology
The richness and seasonal variation of ant‐plant interactions were compared in four habitats in México: lowland tropical dry forest (La Mancha, Veracruz), coastal sand dune matorral (San Benito, Yucatán), semiarid highland vegetation (Zapotitlán, Puebla), and lower montane humid forest (Xalapa, Veracruz). The effects of temperature and precipitation on the seasonal distribution of the number of ant‐plant interactions differed among habitats. The general linear models fitted to the ant‐plant interaction curves explained 78.8 percent of the variation for La Mancha, 80.1 percent for Zapotitlán, 18 percent for San Benito, and 29.5 percent for Xalapa. Even though rainfall is low in Zapotitlán and San Benito, minimum temperature was the most important factor accounting for the seasonal distribution and low number of interactions. At La Mancha, with milder minimum temperatures and higher water availability, temperature alone did not account for the seasonal distribution and number of interactions, whereas the effect of the precipitation × temperature interaction was highly significant. Xalapa exhibits the lowest temperatures and the highest precipitation, but the role of these factors was only marginal. We suggest that the vegetation at Xalapa, a mixture of tropical and temperate floristic elements, constrains ant‐plant interactions due to a limited presence of nectaries. Also, ants are less abundant in cool and relatively aseasonal habitats. The other habitats have tropical floristic elements that are abundant and frequently have nectar‐producing structures. We report considerable variation among habitats in the number and seasonal distribution of ant‐plant interactions, and suggest that it is due to the effect of variation in environmental parameters, the richness of plants with nectaries in the vegetation, and habitat heterogeneity.