z-logo
Premium
Chemical control of vine weevil larvae on container‐grown hardy ornamental nursery stock 1986–1989
Author(s) -
Cross J V.,
Buxton J H.,
Jacobson R.,
Richardson D M.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
annals of applied biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.677
H-Index - 80
eISSN - 1744-7348
pISSN - 0003-4746
DOI - 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1995.tb07610.x
Subject(s) - weevil , biology , ornamental plant , vine , horticulture , toxicology , pest analysis , compost , larva , pesticide , pest control , botany , agronomy
Summary In a search for alternatives to the former standard aldrin compost incorporation treatment for control of vine weevil (Otiorhynchus sulcatus) larvae on container‐grown hardy ornamental nursery stock, a series of 87 tests of insecticides were done at four experimental centres of the ADAS (Leeds, Reading, Wolverhampton and Wye) from 1986 to 1989. Insecticidally‐treated plants and untreated controls were artificially infested with vine weevil eggs at varying intervals before and after treatment, and the survival of the pest was assessed. Aldrin treatment gave consistent and excellent preventive control of vine weevil larvae for over 2 years. Of the candidate materials tested, a slow‐release granular formulation of chlorpyrifos incorporated into compost at a dose rate of 100 g a.i. m ‐3 of compost gave good control for up to 34 wk after treatment (the longest period evaluated) and a micro‐encapsulated slow release formulation of fonofos incorporated at a dose rate of 43.3 g a.i. m ‐3 usually gave good control for up to two years (the longest period evaluated). Surface applications of these two organophosphates or of carbofuran granules, though sometimes effective, were unreliable as either preventive or remedial treatments even for short term control.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here