z-logo
Premium
Duration of cereal aphid populations and the effects on wheat yield and breadmaking quality
Author(s) -
LEE G.,
STEVENS D. J.,
STOKES SUZANNE,
WRATTEN S. D.
Publication year - 1981
Publication title -
annals of applied biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.677
H-Index - 80
eISSN - 1744-7348
pISSN - 0003-4746
DOI - 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1981.tb00750.x
Subject(s) - sitobion avenae , biology , aphid , pirimicarb , agronomy , glutenin , infestation , population , zoology , aphididae , horticulture , pest analysis , homoptera , biochemistry , demography , protein subunit , sociology , gene
SUMMARY Field‐caged and open‐plot populations of the aphid Sitobion avenae on winter wheat (cv. Maris Widgeon) were sampled approximately twice‐weekly in the summer of 1978. Cage populations began at growth stage 10.2 (Feekes scale) (Zadoks, G. S. 52); they were removed by spraying with pirimicarb at growth stages 10.54 (71), 11.1–11.2 (77) and 11.2–11.3 (85) respectively. All cage populations reduced mean weight per grain but the effect per aphid unit was lowest in the population of longest duration. Although the aphid index in the open plots was higher than that in the early cage treatment, yield was unaffected. Cage infestations affected the breadmaking quality of the grain: percentage flour extraction was reduced and there was an increase in colour, nicotinic acid content and thiamine (vitamin B 1 ) content of the flour; percentage nitrogen in the flour was unaffected but there was a reduction in baking value and in the high molecular weight glutenin content; infestation also reduced α‐amylase activity. Different aspects of grain quality did not change in parallel with one another or with yield changes and thus damage thresholds will vary according to the yield/quality measure under consideration.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here