Premium
A comparison of a corer and a shovel for sampling populations of wheat bulb fly Delia coarctata eggs
Author(s) -
McKINLAY R. G.,
FRANKLINT M. F.
Publication year - 1980
Publication title -
annals of applied biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.677
H-Index - 80
eISSN - 1744-7348
pISSN - 0003-4746
DOI - 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1980.tb04748.x
Subject(s) - shovel , bulb , sampling (signal processing) , ridge , biology , population , plough , sowing , agronomy , horticulture , engineering , paleontology , demography , electrical engineering , filter (signal processing) , sociology
SUMMARY The most commonly used tool for sampling soil for eggs of the wheat bulb fly Delia coarctata Fall.) is a corer, but in Scotland samples are taken with a modified shovel. The sampling properties of a corer and shovel were compared in two exercises in which soil samples were taken from the ridge, sides and furrow of drills of maincrop potatoes at several sites in east Scotland. Although each tool sampled approximately the same surface area of soil, the corer sampled three times as much soil as the shovel. The numbers of wheat bulb fly eggs estimated by the corer and shovel were similar in both sampling exercises and there were no indications that the comparison of the two tools was affected by the sampling position on the potato ridge. The results of the two exercises gave no reason to believe that in similar conditions the shovel is an inferior sampling tool or that population estimates obtained with a shovel in Scotland are not comparable with those obtained with a corer. Evidence from some sites suggested that wheat bulb flies lay more eggs on the potato ridge than in the furrow.