Premium
The involvement of fungi in the breakdown of sulphited strawberries
Author(s) -
Dennis C.
Publication year - 1977
Publication title -
annals of applied biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.677
H-Index - 80
eISSN - 1744-7348
pISSN - 0003-4746
DOI - 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1977.tb00666.x
Subject(s) - aureobasidium pullulans , botrytis cinerea , biology , food spoilage , horticulture , fungicide , mucor , moho , fragaria , botany , food science , penicillium , fungi imperfecti , fermentation , genetics , bacteria
Between 8000 and 9000 tons of strawberries are used annually for jam manufacture in the UK, c. 65 % of which are stored in sulphite liquor (6 % SO 2 +lime, c. pH 3.0). Sporadic cases of disintegration of sulphited strawberries have been observed increasingly in recent years. In laboratory experiments breakdown of whole berries in sulphite liquor was achieved by including berries partly rotted with Mucor mucedo, Rhizopus sexualis or R. stolonifer , 1.5‐2.5 % infected material causing complete breakdown of all of the berries. The inclusion of up to 25 % berries infected with Botrytis cinerea caused no softening of the berries. The addition of culture filtrates to whole fruit in sulphite liquor confirmed observations with the above fungi but also showed that pectolytic enzymes from Aureobasidium pullulans and Trichosporon pullulans could cause breakdown. The incidence of spoilage fungi on commercially harvested fruit indicated that M. mucedo and R. sexualis were the main cause of breakdown, but that A. pullulans increased tenfold on fruit stored at 15 °C overnight before sulphiting. Results from commercially harvested fruit (cv. Cambridge Favourite) in 1975 and 1976 showed that: (I) fruit should be sulphited as soon as possible after harvest, since the storage of harvested fruit prior to sulphiting may give a poorer quality product; (2) there is little difference in breakdown of fruit from plants treated with the pre‐harvest fungicides, Elvaron, Mildothane, or Daconil, and (3) fruit grown in different areas of the UK shows varying amounts of breakdown. This may be due to differences in the infection level of Phycomycetes and contamination by other pectolytic fungi or inherent differences in the susceptibility of the fruit to enzyme attack.