Premium
Some factors affecting the efficiency of water‐traps for capturing cabbage root flies
Author(s) -
FINCH S.,
SKINNER G.
Publication year - 1974
Publication title -
annals of applied biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.677
H-Index - 80
eISSN - 1744-7348
pISSN - 0003-4746
DOI - 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1974.tb01398.x
Subject(s) - biology , trapping , root tip , attraction , zoology , horticulture , toxicology , agronomy , ecology , botany , linguistics , philosophy
SUMMARY Several factors influencing the efficiency of water‐traps in capturing cabbage root flies were studied at Wellesbourne in 1971 and 1972. In both the laboratory and field, approximately twice as many flies were caught in fluorescent as in non‐fluorescent yellow traps. Depending upon trap density, addition of a source of the attractant allylisothiocyanate (ANCS) increased the numbers of females captured by approximately twofold in fluorescent traps and from two‐ to sevenfold in non‐fluorescent traps. Traps were equally efficient irrespective of whether the ANCS was renewed every 2, 3, 4 or 5 days. On the first day of trapping, the number of flies caught per unit area was linearly related to the square root of the number of traps in that area. On the following days the rate was probably in equilibrium with the combined effect of immigration and the rate of development of responsive flies in the trapping zone. Most males were caught 30 cm above the soil surface and most females at soil level. Traps 120 cm above the soil surface caught few flies. Populations of marked flies were released into large field cages containing both a section of hedgerow and a plot of cauliflowers. Even after a week, only 81 % of the males and 55 % of the females had been recaptured from the most responsive of these captive populations. Furthermore, only 30 % of females were recaptured when they were more than 8 days old, the age at which most probably enter the new host‐crop.