Premium
SOME OBSERVATIONS ON THE HATCHING RESPONSES OF THE CABBAGE‐ROOT EELWORM, HETERODERA CRUCIFERAE FRANKLIN
Author(s) -
DONCASTER C. C.
Publication year - 1956
Publication title -
annals of applied biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.677
H-Index - 80
eISSN - 1744-7348
pISSN - 0003-4746
DOI - 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1956.tb02123.x
Subject(s) - biology , hatching , brassica , taproot , serial dilution , larva , botany , horticulture , brassicaceae , dilution , agronomy , zoology , medicine , alternative medicine , pathology , physics , thermodynamics
Samples of root diffusate from sprouts ( Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera ), swedes ( B. napus var. napobrassica ), rape kale ( B. napus var. arvmsis ), and white mustard ( Sinupis alba ), all stimulated larval emergence from cysts of Heterodera cruciferae. When mustard‐root diffusate was added to leachings from the other species tested there was no apparent effect on larval emergence. In half dilution with tap water, mustard leachings were comparable in activity with similar dilutions of leachings from the other species under observation. Leachings from soil were less active than those from the four species of plants tested, but showed significant activity in comparison with tap water. The form of the hatching curve was studied using diffusates from both sprouts and mustard roots, and in each case when cumulative hatch was plotted against time on a logarithmic scale, the sigmoid curve obtained closely fitted the theoretical sigmoid calculated from a probit analysis of the data. Estimates were obtained of the log activity values of leachings from the four species of plants tested and from soil, following an examination of the dilution curves for mustard and sprouts root diffusates. These curves were closely parallel with one another, and it was therefore considered justifiable to derive log activity values for these root diffusates, although the cysts used in the hatching tests and the root‐diffusate samples were each obtained from a single source. For this reason some caution is perhaps called for in the interpretation of the results presented in this paper.