z-logo
Premium
Certain aspects of resistance of plum trees to bacterial canker: Part III. The action of cell‐free filtrates of Pseudomonas mors‐prunorum Wormald and related phyto‐pathogenic bacteria on plum trees
Author(s) -
Erikson Dagny,
Montgomery H. B. S.
Publication year - 1945
Publication title -
annals of applied biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.677
H-Index - 80
eISSN - 1744-7348
pISSN - 0003-4746
DOI - 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1945.tb06770.x
Subject(s) - biology , pear , canker , pseudomonas syringae , pseudomonas fluorescens , bacteria , bark (sound) , botany , pseudomonadaceae , pseudomonas , microbiology and biotechnology , horticulture , ecology , genetics
A technique for introducing 2‐3 c.c. liquid into the bark of plum trees is described. Parallel injections with dyestuff throughout the spring failed to afford a reliable index of the invasive powers of the various test fluids introduced in this manner. A susceptible variety of plum (Giant Prune) showed greater injury by cell‐free filtrates of Ps. morsprunorum than did a resistant variety (Warwickshire Drooper), which showed negligible injury. The greatest injuries were caused by filtrates of cultures 5 weeks old, and over, especially when concentrated. Of other bacteria tested Ps. prunicola, Ps. syringae strains, Syringa 3, Ap. No. 1, Ap. No. 2, and Bact. pruni , yielded damaging filtrates, whereas Ps. syringae , strains pear 6 and 7, Ps. tabaci, Ps. fluorescens, Ps. marginalis, Ps. phaseolicola, Ps. tumefaciens, Ps. pisi and Ps. cerasi failed to do so. Some evidence is advanced for the view that the deleterious activity of Ps. mors‐prunorum may be due in part to an endotoxin of protein nature obtainable from the dried bacterial cells by acetic acid extraction.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here