z-logo
Premium
Job Complexity, Performance, and Well‐being: When Does Supplies‐Values Fit Matter? *
Author(s) -
SHAW JASON D.,
GUPTA NINA
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
personnel psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.076
H-Index - 142
eISSN - 1744-6570
pISSN - 0031-5826
DOI - 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00008.x
Subject(s) - psychology , job performance , moderation , centrality , social psychology , job characteristic theory , empirical research , job design , job satisfaction , statistics , mathematics
We extend person–job fit research by investigating job performance as a moderator of the supplies–values fit relationship with strain outcomes (somatic complaints and depression). Drawing on cybernetic stress and psychological centrality perspectives, we argue that supplies–values misfit relates to lower well‐being levels when job performance is low but that this effect is attenuated when job performance is high. The results are consistent with this prediction across 3 studies that provide progressively more rigorous tests of the hypothesis. Implications of the results for theoretical and empirical person–job fit research are addressed.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here