Premium
ON THE INTERCHANGEABILITY OF OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE MEASURES OF EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
Author(s) -
BOMMER WILLIAM H.,
JOHNSON JONATHAN L.,
RICH GREGORY A.,
PODSAKOFF PHILIP M.,
MACKENZIE SCOTT B.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
personnel psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.076
H-Index - 142
eISSN - 1744-6570
pISSN - 0031-5826
DOI - 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01772.x
Subject(s) - psychology , moderation , meta analysis , interchangeability , sample (material) , correlation , social psychology , construct (python library) , statistics , value (mathematics) , applied psychology , mathematics , medicine , geometry , chromatography , computer science , programming language , chemistry
A meta‐analysis of studies containing both objective and subjective ratings of employee performance resulted in a corrected mean correlation of .389. This value, although significantly greater than zero, indicates that objective and subjective performance measures should not be used interchangeably. Moreover, in no moderator subgroup examined did the correlation suggest convergent validity. After discussing issues related to resolving the previous anomalies of primary and meta‐analytic results, a secondary analysis suggested that objective and subjective measures of the same construct at the same level may be used inter‐changeably. The secondary analysis, however, was based on a very limited sample. Future research should address the appropriate dimensionality of employee performance.