Premium
THE PREDICTIVE VALIDITY OF A WORK SAMPLE: A LABORATORY STUDY
Author(s) -
MOUNT MICHAEL K.,
MUCHINSKY PAUL M.,
HANSER LAWRENCE M.
Publication year - 1977
Publication title -
personnel psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.076
H-Index - 142
eISSN - 1744-6570
pISSN - 0031-5826
DOI - 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1977.tb02332.x
Subject(s) - predictive validity , psychology , sample (material) , concurrent validity , test validity , reliability (semiconductor) , personnel selection , work (physics) , test (biology) , consistency (knowledge bases) , reliability engineering , criterion validity , selection (genetic algorithm) , statistics , psychometrics , internal consistency , computer science , clinical psychology , machine learning , artificial intelligence , mathematics , engineering , mechanical engineering , paleontology , power (physics) , chemistry , physics , chromatography , quantum mechanics , biology
Concurrent and predictive test validity data and test‐retest reliability data were obtained for a work sample performance measure and two paper and pencil tests in a laboratory setting. The work sample predicted performance on the criterion comparably with the two traditional paper and pencil tests for both concurrent and predictive validity conditions. The results of this study coupled with the inherent advantages of work samples for personnel selection offer a favorable prognosis for future research and application of work samples. The findings are interpreted in light of a behavioral consistency model and the practical utility of work samples as a personnel selection technique.