Premium
THE STATE IS STRONG BUT I AM WEAK: WHY THE “IMMINENT LAWLESS ACTION” STANDARD SHOULD NOT APPLY TO TARGETED SPEECH THAT THREATENS INDIVIDUALS WITH VIOLENCE
Author(s) -
Reed O. Lee
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
american business law journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.248
H-Index - 23
eISSN - 1744-1714
pISSN - 0002-7766
DOI - 10.1111/j.1744-1714.2000.tb00287.x
Subject(s) - arson , action (physics) , state (computer science) , call to action , psychology , political science , criminology , linguistics , history , philosophy , business , advertising , computer science , physics , algorithm , quantum mechanics
Surely there is a profound difference between inciting to arson by the use of words and inciting to revolution by the use of words. We do not have a ready word for the distinction, yet it is a deep and obvious one.—Harry Kalven, Jr.