z-logo
Premium
IS THE APPROXIMATION RULE IN THE CHILD'S BEST INTERESTS?
Author(s) -
Riggs Shelley A.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
family court review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.171
H-Index - 4
eISSN - 1744-1617
pISSN - 1531-2445
DOI - 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2005.00048.x
Subject(s) - rule of law , psychology , mathematical economics , mathematics , law , political science , politics
In an effort to develop clear and uniform standards for the allocation of custodial responsibility, the American Law Institute has proposed a number of reforms. For example, under the approximation rule, the proportion of time parents spent with their children performing direct caregiving functions prior to the divorce would be reflected in the proportion of custodial time allotted to each parent after divorce. Much of the rationale used to justify the approximation rule is explicitly or implicitly based on attachment theory (Bowlby, 1969, 1973, 1980). This article discusses the assumptions and implications of the approximation rule from the standpoint of attachment theory.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here