z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Pathway management in ambulatory wound care: defining local standards for quality improvement and interprofessional care
Author(s) -
Hensen Peter,
Ma HuongLan,
Luger Thomas A,
Roeder Norbert,
Steinhoff Martin
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
international wound journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.867
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1742-481X
pISSN - 1742-4801
DOI - 10.1111/j.1742-4801.2005.00098.x
Subject(s) - medicine , clinical pathway , multidisciplinary approach , documentation , quality management , ambulatory care , health care , patient satisfaction , ambulatory , protocol (science) , quality (philosophy) , intensive care medicine , medical emergency , nursing , management system , operations management , alternative medicine , surgery , social science , philosophy , epistemology , pathology , sociology , computer science , economics , programming language , economic growth
Growing health care costs and changes in health care delivery, such as the adoption of the diagnosis‐related groups, have tremendously affected treatment patterns all over the world. Pathway management is suitable to be responsive to the growing operating requirements and to manage effective and efficient medical care in hospitals. Pathways standardise clinical processes for patients with a similar diagnosis, procedure or symptom thereby optimising the quality of treatment and patient satisfaction. They are utilised by a multidisciplinary team with a primary focus on quality and coordination of care. Considering the key strategies of pathway management, an interprofessional team containing physicians and nurses developed and implemented a clinical pathway for ambulatory treatment of chronic wounds. A precise medical protocol was created to standardise routine procedures, to improve the treatment outcome and to provide an integrated documentation that enhances interprofessional collaboration. We designed a modular concept of four different sheets which provide pre‐defined standards: (a) medical admission, (b) findings and history, (c) topic and systemic treatment and (d) evaluation of outcome criteria. Variances must be merely written down in detail. After 1 year in clinical practice, we state that the use of a clinical pathway for chronic wound management is an effective method of improving clinical processes and patient outcomes.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here