Premium
Perturbation of membranes by the amyloid β‐peptide – a molecular dynamics study
Author(s) -
Lemkul Justin A.,
Bevan David R.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
the febs journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.981
H-Index - 204
eISSN - 1742-4658
pISSN - 1742-464X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07024.x
Subject(s) - peptide , lipid bilayer , dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine , biophysics , melittin , bilayer , chemistry , membrane , molecular dynamics , biochemistry , phospholipid , biology , phosphatidylcholine , computational chemistry
The etiology of Alzheimer’s disease is considered to be linked to interactions between amyloid β‐peptide (Aβ) and neural cell membranes. Membrane disruption and increased ion conductance have been observed in vitro in the presence of Aβ, and it is assumed that these same phenomena occur in the brain of an individual afflicted with Alzheimer’s. The effects of Aβ on lipid behavior have been characterized experimentally, but details are lacking regarding how Aβ induces these effects. Simulations of Aβ in a bilayer environment can provide the resolution necessary to explain how the peptide interacts with the surrounding lipids. In the present study, we present an extensive analysis of lipid parameters for a model dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine bilayer in the presence of the 40‐residue Aβ peptide (Aβ40). The simulated systems examine the effects of the insertion depth of the peptide, temperature, the protonation state of the peptide, and ionic strength on the features of the lipid bilayer. The results show that Aβ40 is capable of disordering nearby lipids, as well as decreasing bilayer thickness and area per lipid headgroup. These phenomena arise as a result of the unfolding process of the peptide, which leads to a disordered, extended conformation that is capable of extensive electrostatic and hydrogen‐bonding interactions between the peptide and the lipid headgroups. Comparisons are made using melittin‐dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine systems as positive controls of a membrane‐disrupting peptide because these systems have previously been characterized experimentally as well as in molecular dynamics simulations.