Patient satisfaction with eletriptan in the acute treatment of migraine in primary care

Summary Objective:  The efficacy of triptans for acute migraine has been well established in clinical trials but not in primary care, where they are most commonly prescribed. The aim of this open‐label study was to evaluate the effectiveness of eletriptan 40 mg in primary care, using a patient‐weighted satisfaction scale. Methods:  Eligible patients met International Headache Society criteria for migraine, with 1–6 attacks per month. Patients completed questionnaires at screening and following a single eletriptan‐treated attack. Treatment satisfaction was evaluated using a six‐item Medication Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ). MSQ item scores were weighted, based on the important score ratings, to yield individualised satisfaction scores. The primary end‐point was the difference in weighted satisfaction scores between the patient's previous treatment and eletriptan 40 mg. Secondary end‐points assessed quality of life (QOL), functioning and efficacy of treatment. Results:  Of 590 patients screened, 437 completed the study. Degree (95.2%), time (88.8%) and duration (83.8%) of headache pain relief were rated as most important by patients. The mean (±SD) total satisfaction score on the MSQ was higher for eletriptan than previous therapy (2.2 ± 3.0 vs. 0.6 ± 2.4; p < 0.001). The high level of satisfaction with eletriptan vs. previous treatment reflects the improvements in QOL and functioning observed, and the high headache and pain‐free response rates. Conclusions:  Patient‐weighted satisfaction with eletriptan 40 mg was higher than with previous treatment for all items. The use of patient‐weighted importance ratings of satisfaction is a promising approach for establishing effectiveness of treatment in primary care.