Premium
Risky Discharges: Are We Too Cautious?
Author(s) -
Hanger H.C.,
Sainsbury R.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
australian journal on ageing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.63
H-Index - 34
eISSN - 1741-6612
pISSN - 0726-4240
DOI - 10.1111/j.1741-6612.1997.tb01040.x
Subject(s) - medicine , multidisciplinary approach , medical emergency , gerontology , sociology , social science
Some elderly individuals choose to remain at home, despite considerable risks of injury or even death. We followed 19 patients who returned home despite all of the multidisciplinary team considering that they were extremely unsafe and at considerable risk. At six months, 10(53%) were still at home, 5(26%) were in rest homes, 1(5%) was in long stay hospital care and 3(16%) had died. The three patients who “failed to manage” at home, did so early (within one day), emphasising the importance of a “trial leave” period Patients who lived with a carer were more likely to remain at home than those who lived alone (p = 0.006), These findings suggest that very frail, “at risk”, elderly patients can often manage at home despite considerable dangers.