Premium
RACE IGNORE‐ANCE, COLORTALK, AND WHITE COMPLICITY: WHITE IS…WHITE ISN’T 1
Author(s) -
Applebaum Barbara
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
educational theory
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.21
H-Index - 42
eISSN - 1741-5446
pISSN - 0013-2004
DOI - 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00230.x
Subject(s) - complicity , white (mutation) , sociology , race (biology) , harm , agency (philosophy) , epistemology , law , psychology , gender studies , philosophy , social psychology , political science , social science , biochemistry , chemistry , gene
A bstract In this review essay, Barbara Applebaum uses white complicity as a framework for discussing three books: Mica Pollock’s Colormute: Race Talk Dilemmas in an American School , Debra Van Ausdale and Joe R. Feagin’s The First R: How Children Learn Race and Racist , and Virginia Lea and Judy Helfand’s Identifying Race and Transforming Whiteness in the Classroom . She explains the notion of white complicity and discusses some of the deep philosophical questions involving moral responsibility and agency that arise when one acknowledges white complicity. In particular, she examines the question of whether complicity is best described as grounded in individual intention or as an outcome of collective action, as well as whether “complicity” as a word displaces the strong sense of harm implied by the term “racist.” Finally, Applebaum explores how some of these philosophical questions crisscross through the discussions highlighted in the three books.