z-logo
Premium
Psychoanalytic Criticism of Shakespeare
Author(s) -
Mikics David
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
literature compass
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.158
H-Index - 4
ISSN - 1741-4113
DOI - 10.1111/j.1741-4113.2006.00329.x
Subject(s) - psychoanalytic theory , criticism , psychoanalysis , catharsis , tempest , literature , reading (process) , philosophy , object (grammar) , psychology , art , linguistics
Why has Shakespeare proved such profitable ground for psychoanalytic study? Part of the answer lies in the affinity between theatre, not just Shakespeare’s, and psychoanalytic practice, an affinity recognized by Freud when he adapted Aristotle’s idea of catharsis to his own “talking cure.” This essay traces psychoanalytic criticism of Shakespeare from its origins in the work of Freud and Ernest Jones through studies by Jung, Rank, Lacan, Norman Holland, and others. In conclusion, the author presents a practical example of psychoanalytic Shakespeare criticism: a reading of The Tempest drawing on the object relations school of D. W. Winnicott.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here