Premium
Work‐Family Enrichment and Conflict: Additive Effects, Buffering, or Balance?
Author(s) -
Gareis Karen C.,
Barnett Rosalind Chait,
Ertel Karen A.,
Berkman Lisa F.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of marriage and family
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.578
H-Index - 159
eISSN - 1741-3737
pISSN - 0022-2445
DOI - 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00627.x
Subject(s) - psychology , work (physics) , social psychology , balance (ability) , affect (linguistics) , work–family conflict , explanatory power , mental health , developmental psychology , psychotherapist , mechanical engineering , philosophy , communication , epistemology , neuroscience , engineering
We used data from the Midlife Development in the United States (MIDUS I) (N = 2,031) to compare three models of how work‐family conflict and enrichment might operate to predict well‐being (mental health, life satisfaction, affect balance, partner relationship quality). We found no support for a relative‐difference model in which the conflict‐enrichment balance predicted outcomes. In the work‐to‐family direction, the additive model fit best: Both work‐to‐family conflict and work‐to‐family enrichment were independently linked to outcomes. In the family‐to‐work direction, the interactive model fit best: Family‐to‐work enrichment buffered the negative outcomes ordinarily linked to family‐to‐work conflict. Enrichment is key because with the additive model, it contributed incremental explanatory power, and with the buffering model, it conditioned conflict‐outcome relationships. Work‐to‐family conflict and family‐to‐work enrichment appeared particularly salient for well‐being.