Premium
Nonmarital Unions, Family Definitions, and Custody Decision Making
Author(s) -
Holtzman Mellisa
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
family relations
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.772
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1741-3729
pISSN - 0197-6664
DOI - 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00670.x
Subject(s) - expansive , scholarship , family law , psychology , social psychology , function (biology) , judicial opinion , criminology , developmental psychology , political science , law , materials science , compressive strength , evolutionary biology , composite material , biology
Relationships that have not been formalized by marriage but that function like marriage are increasingly common among couples. Many of these relationships involve children who are related to only one of the adults but who have established parent‐child relationships with both adults. This raises questions about how best to preserve children's attachment relationships in the event that the adult relationship dissolves. Recent scholarship advocates two distinct approaches: some argue for legal recognition of expansive definitions of the family whereas others advocate for legal recognition of children's rights. This research examines the efficacy of these competing arguments. Findings suggest that judicial recognition of family definitions is not, on its own, enough to protect nonbiological attachments. Instead, family definitions must also be combined with a focus on children's rights. The legal and policy implications of these findings are discussed.