Premium
Retracted: Translation and validation of the Hindi version of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index
Author(s) -
Deshmukh Saee Prasad,
Radke Usha M.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
gerodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.7
H-Index - 54
eISSN - 1741-2358
pISSN - 0734-0664
DOI - 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2011.00609.x
Subject(s) - cronbach's alpha , medicine , discriminant validity , hindi , construct validity , oral health , convergent validity , content validity , quality of life (healthcare) , reliability (semiconductor) , gerontology , dentistry , clinical psychology , psychometrics , internal consistency , artificial intelligence , nursing , power (physics) , physics , quantum mechanics , computer science
doi: 10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2011.00609.x Translation and validation of the Hindi version of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index Purpose: To translate the original English version of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) into Hindi and assess its validity and reliability for use among people in India. Materials and Method: After translation into Hindi, a total of 385 participants aged 55+ demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability when used for people in India. Individual GOHAI items were recorded and summed as originally recommended. The questionnaire sought information about socio‐demographic characteristics and self‐reported perception of general and oral health. Clinical examination included assessment of periodontal status and number of decayed teeth, missing teeth, filled teeth and crowned teeth. Result: Mean GOHAI score was 40.9 (SD, 10.6; range, 12–60). Cronbach’s alpha for the GOHAI score was 0.88, indicating a high degree of internal consistency and homogeneity between the GOHAI items. The test–retest correlation coefficient for add‐GOHAI scores was 0.72, indicating good stability. Add‐GOHAI scores increased with poorer perceived general and oral health. Convergent validity, construct validity and discriminant validity of the GOHAI were demonstrated. Conclusion: It could therefore be used as a valuable instrument for measuring oral health–related quality of life for people in this region.