Premium
Surface changes in denture soft liners with and without sealer coating following abrasion with mechanical brushing
Author(s) -
Mainieri Vivian C.,
Beck Joaquim,
Oshima Hugo M.,
Hirakata Luciana M.,
Shinkai Rosemary S.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
gerodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.7
H-Index - 54
eISSN - 1741-2358
pISSN - 0734-0664
DOI - 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2010.00375.x
Subject(s) - medicine , abrasion (mechanical) , dentistry , coating , composite material , materials science
Gerodontology 2010; doi: 10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2010.00375.xSurface changes in denture soft liners with and without sealer coating following abrasion with mechanical brushingAim: To evaluate the surface alterations of soft liners with or without sealer coating following abrasion with mechanical brushing. Methods: Thirty specimens were made of a methacrylate‐ (Coe‐Soft) and a siloxane‐based material (Ufi‐Gel SC), and 15 received two coatings of surface sealer. The specimens were submitted to a mechanical brushing‐dentifrice assay under 200 g of force at 250 cycles/min. Mechanical brushing was simulated for a period of 1 (1250 cycles) and 6 months (5000 cycles). Surface roughness (Ra parameter) was measured, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained. Ra data were analysed by anova for repeated measures and Bonferroni’s test (alpha = 0.05). Results: Ra increased from baseline to 6 months regardless of sealer coating. At baseline, only Coe‐Soft without sealer had a higher Ra than the other groups. After 1 month, the Ra of Coe‐Soft with sealer was three‐fold higher than the Ra at baseline; the other groups showed no significant increase of Ra. SEM images showed degradation of the soft liners over time, except for the Ufi‐Gel SC with sealer, which displayed minimum alteration of surface texture. Conclusion: Sealer coating reduced the surface degradation of the tested soft liners, but the protective effect was more pronounced for the siloxane‐based material.