Premium
The advantages of occupational therapy in oral hygiene measures for institutionalised elderly adults
Author(s) -
Bellomo Fleurange,
Preux Frédérique de,
Chung JeanPierre,
Julien Noëlle,
BudtzJørgensen Ejvind,
Müller Frauke
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
gerodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.7
H-Index - 54
eISSN - 1741-2358
pISSN - 0734-0664
DOI - 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2004.00047.x
Subject(s) - medicine , oral hygiene , context (archaeology) , placebo , occupational therapy , tooth brushing , dentistry , physical therapy , alternative medicine , toothbrush , paleontology , brush , engineering , pathology , electrical engineering , biology
Objective: To investigate a new method in teaching and supervising tooth and denture brushing activities by employing occupational therapy techniques. Materials and methods: Sixty‐one residents, 44 women and 17 men, with an average age of 85.7 ± 6.6 years (range 72–97 years) living in a Long‐Term Care home (LTC) in Geneva were enrolled in a randomised controlled trial. They were divided at random into experimental (EG) and control groups (CG) with matched age and sex distribution. Two subjects passed away during the 3‐month experimental period. Following medical history, plaque scores and tooth brushing habits were evaluated within the context of a comprehensive clinical assessment. Furthermore, a Mini Mental State and a vision test were taken. Based on the results of these health assessments both the EG and the CG were divided into an ‘assisted’ (IA) and an ‘independent‘ (II) subgroup. In the EG, tooth brushing was initially taught and in the IA monitored and re‐educated once a week by an occupational therapist. In contrast, the CG‐IA group received a weekly placebo activity such as manicure by the same person. Results: From the individual movements taught and monitored by the occupational therapist, opening a tube of toothpaste (n.s.) and denture brushing ( p < 0.05) were performed more independently after 3 months. Both the occupational therapy and the placebo activity led to a significant improvement in oral ( p < 0.01 and 0.05) and in denture hygiene ( p < 0.001 and 0.05). From all participants, the EG‐IA subgroup presented the most significant amelioration in plaque ( p < 0.01) and denture hygiene scores ( p < 0.001). This group consisted mostly of subjects with an impaired cognitive state. Conclusions: Despite the marked placebo effect, the results indicate that occupational therapy is particularly useful to improve the oral and denture hygiene in dependent and cognitively impaired LTC residents and may promote their autonomy in the execution of activities of daily life such as denture brushing.