Premium
SONOGRAPHIC AND SCINTIGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF ACUTE RENAL ALLOGRAFT REJECTION IN CATS
Author(s) -
Halling Krista B.,
Graham John P.,
Newell Susan P.,
Ellison Gary W.,
Detrisac Carol J.,
Martin Frank G.,
Vangilder James M.,
Grossman Daniel
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
veterinary radiology and ultrasound
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.541
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1740-8261
pISSN - 1058-8183
DOI - 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2003.tb00535.x
Subject(s) - medicine , cats , echogenicity , urology , renal function , kidney , transplantation , renal blood flow , obstructive uropathy , pathology , urinary system , surgery , ultrasonography
The sonographic features of acute renal allograft rejection in humans and dogs are manifested by increase in renal cross‐sectional area and reduction in renal cortical blood flow. These changes have not been investigated in cats. The objectives of this study were to evaluate sonographic and scintigraphic changes during acute renal allograft rejection in cats. Eight SPF, intact, adult, male cats received heterotopic renal allotransplantations. Immunosuppressive doses of cyclosporine and prednisolone were administered for 14 days and then discontinued to allow acute allograft rejection to occur. Serial measurements of renal cross‐sectional area, resistive index (RI), echogenicity, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were performed to evaluate changes during acute rejection. Upon sonographic confirmation of absent diastolic blood flow or a 20% increase in cross‐sectional area of the allograft, a nephrectomy and histopathologic evaluation were performed. Acute allograft rejection was confirmed histologically in all cats. Significant increases in renal cross‐sectional area ( P < 0.001) occurred postoperatively and during rejection. There were no significant changes in RI ( P = 0.43) at any time. A subjective increase in medullary echogenicity and a decrease in corticomedullary demarcation were observed in the rejection period. While GFR decreased significantly in the immediate postoperative period ( P < 0.001), no further change occurred during rejection ( P = 0.42). Changes in RI and GFR do not appear to be sensitive indicators of acute renal allograft rejection in cats. Serial measurements of renal cross‐sectional area appear to be a sensitive method for the early diagnosis of allograft rejection in feline renal transplant recipients.