Premium
The Trial Penalty and Jury Sentencing: A Study of Air Force Courts‐Martial
Author(s) -
Breen Patricia D.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of empirical legal studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.529
H-Index - 24
eISSN - 1740-1461
pISSN - 1740-1453
DOI - 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01206.x
Subject(s) - jury , plea , jury trial , jurisdiction , law , political science , punishment (psychology) , sentencing guidelines , criminology , psychology , social psychology , linguistics , philosophy , sentence
The sentencing empirical literature generally supports the notion that most defendants plead guilty because judges impose more severe sentences for those who assert their Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial. Whether this trial penalty effect is present in jury sentencing jurisdictions has been rarely investigated. King and Noble (2004, 2005) presented evidence suggesting that in practice, jury sentencing assists prosecutors and judges in maintaining a trial penalty or plea discount system. The present study investigates whether a trial penalty exists in the military—a jury sentencing jurisdiction that offers jury sentencing after a guilty plea as well as a trial. Using Air Force court‐martial data from 2005–2006, the study finds no trial penalty effect and that juries are less likely to impose severe types of punishment compared to judges. The study discusses implications for public policy, theory, and future research.