Premium
Victim‐Based Effects on Racially Disparate Sentencing in Ohio
Author(s) -
Wooldredge John,
Griffin Timothy,
Thistlethwaite Amy,
Rauschenberg Fritz
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of empirical legal studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.529
H-Index - 24
eISSN - 1740-1461
pISSN - 1740-1453
DOI - 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01202.x
Subject(s) - pleading , prison , odds , criminology , period (music) , african american , sentencing guidelines , psychology , race (biology) , life imprisonment , political science , law , history , sentence , sociology , medicine , gender studies , logistic regression , ethnology , linguistics , physics , philosophy , acoustics
Scholars have argued that African‐American men accused of violently victimizing whites receive especially harsh treatment in court. This thesis was tested with samples of felony defendants processed in Ohio courts before and after the implementation of sentencing guidelines. During the preguideline period only, African‐American men accused of victimizing whites were less likely than other defendants to plead guilty in exchange for reduced charges and/or sentences, and African‐American men incarcerated for violent crimes against whites received longer sentences than other incarcerated offenders. During the postguideline period only, by contrast, the odds of pleading guilty in exchange for reduced charges were actually higher for African‐American men accused of victimizing whites. African‐American male prison terms significantly declined relative to incarcerated whites from the preguideline to the postguideline period. The interaction effect of defendant‐victim race was significant during the preguideline period, not significant in the postguideline period, and significantly changed over time.