Premium
The Case for Trials: Considering the Intangibles
Author(s) -
Butler Paul
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of empirical legal studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.529
H-Index - 24
eISSN - 1740-1461
pISSN - 1740-1453
DOI - 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2004.00017.x
Subject(s) - compromise , faith , preference , clinical trial , democracy , core (optical fiber) , law and economics , public economics , actuarial science , law , political science , economics , computer science , medicine , epistemology , microeconomics , telecommunications , philosophy , pathology , politics
In the United States, trials perform important functions that are difficult to quantify. Trials, for example, educate Americans about each other, and the law. They are a vivid, practical example of the faith in democracy that lies at the core of the American experiment. It is worrisome that trials are declining as trial arbiters—jurors and judges—become more diverse. The rejection of trials may also evidence a new and troubling cultural preference for compromise over standing on principles. The article recommends that trials be encouraged, including by reducing the costs of losing and by evaluating proposed laws and policies for the effect that they would have on trials.