z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Are UK Commercial Expeditions Complying with Wilderness Medical Society Guidelines on Ascent Rates to Altitude?: Table 1
Author(s) -
Neeraj Shah,
Jeremy S. Windsor,
H. Meijer,
David Hillebrandt
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of travel medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.985
H-Index - 59
eISSN - 1708-8305
pISSN - 1195-1982
DOI - 10.1111/j.1708-8305.2011.00511.x
Subject(s) - altitude (triangle) , medicine , wilderness , table (database) , travel medicine , effects of high altitude on humans , altitude sickness , destinations , tourism , geography , archaeology , ecology , computer science , biology , geometry , data mining , anatomy , psychiatry , mathematics
The incidence of acute mountain sickness can be reduced by ascending slowly to altitude. We compared a recommended ascent rate with those offered by commercial companies to three of the most popular high-altitude destinations in the world. While the majority complied with the recommended ascent rate, ascents on Kilimanjaro did not.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom