z-logo
Premium
Color Management of the Cervical Region Using Different Framework Materials
Author(s) -
ABUALSAUD HAYTHAM,
ZANDPARSA ROYA,
HIRAYAMA HIROSHI,
SADIG WALID,
ABOUSHELIB MOUSTAFA,
SALAMEH ZIAD
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.919
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1708-8240
pISSN - 1496-4155
DOI - 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2010.00387.x
Subject(s) - crown (dentistry) , dentistry , materials science , orthodontics , undercut , aluminum oxide , colorimeter , medicine , composite material , optics , physics , aluminium
Background:  Color‐matching of the cervical area between natural teeth and different crown prostheses is a common clinical problem. Purpose:  The purpose of this study was to compare the color of the cervical region of five commercially available crown systems to an extracted natural tooth and to each other. Materials and Methods:  The color of the cervical region of an extracted maxillary incisor was measured by means of a colorimeter (ShadeVision, X‐Rite). Fifty master dies were fabricated, divided into five groups ( N  = 10) according to the framework material; group 1: high‐noble gold alloy, group 2: same as group 1 but treated with gold paste material, group 3: precious reinforced alloy, group 4: white zirconium oxide substructure (Lava 3M ESPE), and group 5: shaded zirconium oxide (Lava). A direct comparison of L *, a *, and b * parameters was accomplished between the control natural tooth and the five crown systems, and the mean color differences (Δ E ) was calculated. The data were statistically analyzed with one‐way analysis of variance and post hoc multiple comparison (α = 0.05). Results:  Compared to the natural tooth, the mean color differences (Δ E ) values were clinically unacceptable for all groups (Δ E  > 3.7). The detected color differences, among different porcelain systems, were not visually perceptible (Δ E  < 3.7). Conclusions:  Within the limitations of this study, the cervical color of an extracted natural tooth could not be duplicated using different crowns systems. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Color‐matching of the cervical region of different crown systems with natural tooth remains a difficult task. (J Esthet Restor Dent 23:371–379, 2011)

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here